My wife and I saw Harry Potter and the Prisoner of Azkhaban on Friday evening. Cinematographically, it was a decent flick. The special effects were also on par with most other fantasy films out nowadays (kudos to ILM as always). Gary Oldman was entertaining and talented as usual. Some of my colleagues may castrate me for this comment, but I do think J.K. Rowlings is a good writer. I’m sure that the commercial power behind the Harry Potter series is a large reason for its success, but all the same, Rowlings has some good writing behind this franchise as well.
Harry Potter’s struggle to find a true family seems to be a consistently compelling overarching aspect of his series. Rowlings cashes in on the apparent European fascination with the ambiguous romantic triangle between two guys and a girl. It always fascinates me that many Harry Potter fans also laud the “growth” of Harry Potter’s powers. It seems that many Harry Potter fans are expectant of the day that he will “unleash” his full magical might upon the powers of evil. However, as a practicing Christian, I will be the last to naively deny our society’s fascination with messiahs.
In this latest installment of the series, I was particularly struck by Rowlings’ conception of time travel. Time travel is always a tricky narrative to consider in fiction. There is always the problems of ramifications of actions; altering of timelines; and the question of whether time travel is even possible. I can recall the four pages of Starlog magazine devoted to the consideration of “what exactly happened” in time travel in the 1980’s series of Back to the Future. However, I liked how time travel was handled in Prisoner of Azkhaban.
In this film, nothing is actually visibly altered by the time travel of the main characters. When the main characters travel back in time to possibly undo some kind of wrong, their actions instead explain some of what actually happened in the timeline that they came from, and in the end, everything works out fine. Instead of changing the past, they actually fulfill the outcome of events in time. This addresses one of the concerns with the conception of time travel. If you change something in the past, you erase the prerogative to go back in time in the first place, and you effectively eradicate yourself out of the timeline. However, if the timeline already accounts for your actions in the past, then everything proceeds as normal. I won’t get into a huge debate over time travel here, but this is the basic idea of one problem. Feel free to respond to this if you can elaborate more on the issue.
Anyhow, I would give Harry Potter and The Prisoner of Azkhaban an 8 out of 10 as a form of entertainment. It was fun to watch. It wasn’t groundbreaking as a film, and I wouldn’t advise people to rush out to the theatres today, but it was still worth the standard theatre fare.